Deepfake Videos: When Seeing Isn’t Believing


Deepfake Videos: When Seeing Isn’t Believing


Image result for depfake"


Holly Kathleen Hall

Arkansas State University






“The 2016 election evidenced a change in how campaign news and information spreads, especially false or misleading information, and the involvement of a foreign government in its dissemination. This new direction increased apprehension regarding the effect and influence of the new communication dynamic on the democratic process. Advancing technology and increasing popularity of social media networks have led to a rise in video creation and sharing. Innovations in technology are also allowing the public to edit and tinker with videos, creating falsified or fabricated content that appears very real. In 2018 a new software tool was released to the public, allowing the creation of videos of human faces of one person to be substituted for another. The result is videos of people speaking words they have never articulated and/or performing tasks they never did. There has been a dramatic uptick in the creation of these “deepfake” videos, leading to potential legal implications in the areas of privacy, defamation, and free expression.

The extraordinary success of fake news being accepted in the marketplace creates grave concerns for individuals and democracy. This is exacerbated when a video is added to the equation. Ponder some of the following potential situations: blackmailers using deepfakes to extort money or private information, a deepfake showing a government official accepting a bribe he/she never took, or a deepfake depicting an official announcing an impending attack by a foreign government. The possibilities are alarming. The capacity for harm caused by deepfakes naturally leads to considering new laws and regulations. However, any regulation of speech and expression in the United States implicates the First Amendment. In the past we have relied on the “marketplace of ideas” concept, which encourages more speech as a means to uncover the truth and have the best ideas rise to the fore, rather than censor particular content. Is this argument still valid when the public cannot discern what information is true, misleading, or false?

This article will first discuss the rise of fake news in the United States governmental process. Then this article will explore the practice of deepfake videos, including their potential use as tools of deception in the electoral process, and the complexities of regulations around this form of communication, given First Amendment protections. The paper concludes with recommendations to combat deepfakes and fake news in general.”

You can find original paper from the link below:

2012 yılında Japonca eğitimim sonrasında hukuk fakültesine başladı. Jürging-Örkün-Putzar Rechtsanwalte (Almanya), Güler Hukuk Bürosu ve Ünsal & Gündüz Attorneys at Law' da staj yaptı. Japon dili sertifikası aldı. Ayrıca arabuluculuk- tahkim ve ceza hukuku gibi alanlarda sertifika programlarına katıldı.Bunların akabinde Bilişim ve Teknoloji Hukuku alanında yüksek lisans yapmaya başladı. Köksal & Partners hukuk bürosunda avukat olarak çalışmakta. Büyük bir merakla, robotlar, yapay zeka ve onların hukuksal durumları ve problemler ile ilgili çalışmalar yürütmekte. She studied law following herJapanese education on 2012. She fulfilled her internships in Jurging-Orkun-Putzar Rechtsanwalte(Germany), Guler Law Office and Unsal&Gunduz Attorney at Law . Also she has certificate of Japanese language and she has mediation and arbitration certificates and criminal law certificates from law workshops. Afterwards, she started the master program on information and technology law, at Istanbul Bilgi University. She works as a lawyer at Koksal & Partners law office. Her goal and ambition is the working in the field of Robotics, AI and their legal statutes and problems and exploring the relevant necessities where no women has ever gone before... Yazarın diğer yazıları için ayrıca bakınız: For further works of the author:

Leave a Reply